Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Annual Meeting of the Guttwrencher Institute for Intoxication Planning.  What a lovely banquet.  I can’t remember all of it, but the parts I do remember were lovely [laughter]  Before I introduce our distinguished speaker, allow me to offer a few words about the great event we cerebrate tonight.

THE FURIES OF CONSCIENCE

Denial & the Wages of Sin

J.  Budziszewski

Touchstone 16:7 (September, 2003)

This is the final part of a four-part series which began with “What If?  What If?  Why Shoudn’t?” on Friday, 03-07-2014.

This is the third part of a four-part series which began with “What If?  What If?  Why Shoudn’t?” on Friday, 03-07-2014.

This is the second part of a four-part series which began with “What If?  What If?  Why Shouldn’t?” on Friday, 03-07-2014.

Certain questions tend to come up whenever I teach about natural law.  They don’t always come up in words, much less in these words, but they often lurk beneath and between the lines.  What if our nature had been different?  What if we changed our nature?  Why shouldn’t we transcend our nature?

The actual title of the post you are looking for is "This Time Will Not Be the Same."

You can read part 1 here.

You can read part 2 here.

This is Part 2 -- Click Here for Part 1

This is Part 1 -- Click Here for Part 2

If neutralism is impossible, then bias is inevitable.  So what am I saying?  Should laws and rules and policies embrace bias?  Is bias good?