
The Underground Thomist
Blog
Revisiting “Because”Tuesday, 12-29-2015I am still thinking about my friend’s anecdote about the students in his class who thought life had no meaning. He adds, “there were two or three students who did not buy the nihilism line -- they thought that maybe, perhaps we had a purpose. But they were either unable to articulate it, or unwilling to, due to the strong majority opinion.” Does anything about the story strike you as strange? Here’s what strikes me. One would think that people who did think life has meaning and purpose would be more willing to confess their conviction than those who didn’t. Yet they the ones who couldn’t or wouldn’t speak up. The explanation doesn’t lie in the Ursula Le Guin novel my friend had assigned them, for I find the same thing among my own students, and I don’t assign them Ursula Le Guin. Fear of the majority, sure, but why should the nihilists be in the majority? Historically, this is a novel situation. Nihilism – and I speak as a former nihilist – is far from natural for human beings. My own guess is that in our day, those who believe life has purpose are all too often ashamed to speak up because they aren’t living up to their belief. Although those who deny the proposition generally have even more to be ashamed of, insisting on meaninglessness helps them pretend that they don’t. Belief is a blade. It can cut you. Nonbelief is a cloak. You can hide in it. See also: "If I Were a Nightingale"
|
What? They Disagree?Monday, 12-28-2015Question:How can any one religion be correct when each claims to be correct? Reply:I respect your question, but I don’t think you need my help to answer it. Suppose you were an astronomy student. How would you answer if someone asked, “How could one theory of planetary formation be correct, when each claims to be correct?” Or, since you are in law school, how you would answer if someone asked, “How could one explanation of legislative intent be correct, when each claims to be correct?” Disagreement does not invalidate the quest for the truth; it is the reason for the quest for the truth. The fact that different answers are in competition with each other does not suggest that there is no answer, but that to find it we must seek it. The most important prerequisite for the search – and the one most often overlooked – is really wanting to find what you are looking for. Do you want to?
|
The State of the Controversy (in a Very Long View)Sunday, 12-27-2015Pagan natural law theory is non-historical. Human nature cannot change, and its condition has not changed. We are what we are, and we are as we are, forever and ever. Christian natural law theory is historical. In itself human nature cannot change, but its condition can change, and it has. We were created; we have lost our original integrity; the cure has been offered. In the early modern era the playing field was altered. Some tried to use natural law to deny, ignore, or marginalize salvation history. Others tried to make profane history do the work of natural law, and the state do the work of God. The first modern gambit is dead. Variations on the second are still playing out.
|
To BelieveSaturday, 12-26-2015
-- St. Augustine, Exposition on Psalm 71, Section 2
|
If You Are One of ThoseFriday, 12-25-2015If you are one of those who are as yet unclean, ... unfit for sacrifice, and of the gentile portion – then run with the Star, and bear your Gifts with the Magi: Gold, frankincense, and myrrh, as to a King, to God, and to One who is dead for you. With Shepherds glorify Him; with Angels join in chorus; with Archangels sing hymns. Let this Festival be common to the powers in heaven and to the powers upon earth. For I am persuaded that the Heavenly Hosts join in our exultation and keep high Festival with us today. -- St. Gregory Nazianzen, Oration 38, Section 17 |
For Hold This FastThursday, 12-24-2015For hold this fast as a firm and settled truth, if you would continue Catholics, that God the Father begot God the Son without time, and made Him of a Virgin in time. The first nativity exceeds times; the second nativity enlightens times. Yet both nativities are marvelous; the one without a mother, the other without a father. When God begot the Son, He begot Him of Himself, not of a mother; when the Mother gave birth to her Son, she gave Him birth as a Virgin, not by man. He was born of the Father without a beginning; He was born of a mother, as today at an appointed beginning. Born of the Father He made us; born of a mother He re-made us. He was born of the Father, that we might be; He was born of a mother, that we might not be lost. -- St. Augustine of Hippo, Sermon 90 on the New Testament, Section 2
|
By DegreesWednesday, 12-23-2015Since to everyone what is familiar is dear, both God and the men who are sent by Him manage things on this principle with a view to the salvation of the world. Think it not therefore unworthy of Him to have called [the wise men] by a star; since by the same [false reasoning] you will find fault with all the Jewish rites also, the sacrifices, and the purifications, and the new moons, and the ark, and the temple too itself. For even these derived their origin from Gentile grossness. Yet for all that, God, for the salvation of them who were in error, endured being served by the very things by which [those outside the faith] were accustomed to serving devils -- only He slightly altered them, that He might draw them off by degrees from their customs, and lead them towards the highest wisdom. Just so He did in the case of the wise men also, not disdaining to call them by sight of a star, that He might lift them higher ever after. Therefore, after He has brought them, leading them by the hand, and has set them by the manger, it is no longer by a star, but by an angel that He now discourses unto them. Thus did they little by little become better men. -- St. John Chrysostom, Homily 6 on Matthew, Section 4
|